I believe about a year ago I said this would happen

[voguy]

WARNING: Graphic Discussion

Last year there was all the hoopla over getting rid of Confederate symbols including flags, patches, statues, and let's not forget The General Lee. That's right, a friggin car in a TV show is now so offensive some people have charged they were made sick by looking at it.

Then we had the gay rights demands where .1% were able to demand change although 99.9% opposed it. Today we have the sill ass bathroom wars, with President Obama's mandate to schools that they all conform, (a massive overreach).

I said this would happen, and Germany, (of all nations), is considering allowing sex with minors as seen in this story below from November 1, 2015. So now some in North America are considering pushing this subject by rewording the law to leave in "consensual" but remove the age limit. Meaning that as long as a minor says it's OK, it's legal. The groups pushing this are from three nations, Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

As I said before, when you want things, and push for things, sometimes the consequences of actions bring you unintended things which you never dreamed would transpire. Unfortunately, there is case law in play here and by granting and executing the situations people have demanded in the past few years they have now opened the door to this.

Note: Snopes says it's not going to happen, but the darknet is buzzing with traffic on how this can come to be. And in one case, a poster named "LesterBB" said that some in their fold are claiming it not to be true simply to fool the public into thinking this is not happening, thus sliding it in under the radar.

I'm posting just the link to the German story as the content is rather "graphic". The site in the U.S. is even worse with pictures.
LINK TO STORY

Additional Links:

Germany's Green Party leader regrets campaign to 'legalise paedophilia'
A Major German Political Party Used to Support Pedophilia
Snopes Take on the Subject

[Doka]

"Hell is Empty, ALL the Devils are Here!"


Shakespear , I think........

[Doka]

WARNING :More Graphic Discussion

Madness Behind the Method: The Writings of the Craziest SJWs in Academia

With the help of Twitter user, @real_peerreview, I’ve put together a list of the craziest academic works, straight from the minds of the PhD candidates and faculty members who helped architect the coddling culture that is currently taking hold of American college campuses.

In an effort to be objective, the author’s own language is directly used as much as possible in this analysis.

The List:


11.Hobosexual”- Resisting capitalism by having not-for-profit sex with homeless people.


In The Journal of Lesbian Studies, Heather Tapley introduces the term “hobosexual” which is “a concept representative of anti-capitalist practices in both sex and labor.” In this essay, Tapley suggests that LGBT individuals having sex in urban areas is an act of protest against the American capitalistic society.
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/05/1 ... ertations/



What I find interesting is most of the 12 listed here is the perverted link to capitalism? Somebody taught this stuff to these young minds of "mush"?

Do you see any of these people growing their own food or will they just be out "Messing" around with the scare-crow?

[voguy]

Very true. I can't believe what people want in the name of rights and entitlements.

People like this are coming out of the woodwork by the dozens, and instead of our courts hanging them in the public square, the courts argue they are misunderstood and had troubled childhoods.

I'm concerned that this "Age is only a Number" group is going to push more and more to get the definitions changed to allow consent.

[voguy]

What I find interesting is most of the 12 listed here is the perverted link to capitalism? Somebody taught this stuff to these young minds of "mush"?
Do you see any of these people growing their own food or will they just be out "Messing" around with the scare-crow?

That list was probably "astroturf". Some group trying to make Capitalism look bad by piling it on with the other sins. Oldest trick in the book, perpetrated by people will little or no souls.

These are the same people who advise us not to judge all Muslims by the actions of a few lunitics, but encourage the nation to judge all gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. I'm convinced their minds are flawed, (ie: mentally incompetent).

[Doka]

The people have been led, most , willingly, by a charismatic leader, a "Pied Piper" of the most evil and cunning. Brainwashed and willing to sell, their souls and heart and then their lives for what? If only to "please" untill they have been Absorbed" into the "collective". And lose all their Humanity reguarding themselves and others and unable to tell ,right actions from wrong actions.


Do you see a correlation here?


ARCHIVISIST OF TRAGEDY: EXCAVATING THE MYSTERY OF JIM JONES AND THE PEOPLES TEMPLE

“You can hear the deterioration of the community, almost in real time.

"“It didn’t really register,” says McGehee. “About 10 minutes into [the jog], Becky was like, I’m too distracted; let’s go back and figure out what the hell’s going on.” They began making phone calls, following reports, sifting the nuggets of truth from the cloudy deposits of breaking news. Shortly after Ryan’s murder, Jim Jones told his congregation they had only one option: The collective suicide he’d spent months preparing. He told them how their deaths would be viewed, saying, “We committed revolutionary suicide protesting the conditions of an inhumane world.” At least some Temple members protested, but Jones was adamant, raving about the forces arrayed against him and cajoling his flock to follow him by drinking a cyanide-laced fruit drink. "

"They did—though not as docilely as would be later suggested, and evoked the glib phrase for unthinking allegiance, “drinking the Kool-Aid.” The night was chaotic, and few Temple members survived. In the aftermath, confused reports reached McGehee and his wife at their home. People were dead, they knew, but how many? First it was a few hundred, then 700, now 900. The Moore sisters played a central role in the Peoples Temple and were unlikely to have survived. Later, a letter from Annie Moore arrived, beginning ominously, “I am 24 years of age right now and don’t expect to live through the end of this book.”

"Within a few weeks, Moore and McGehee filed their first FOIA request with the CIA, seeking any information about Peoples Temple. Initially, they were blown off: A rep asked why they’d believe the agency knew anything. “Give me a break,” McGehee told the rep. “You have 900 Americans who’ve renounced the U.S. very publicly, went to a Third World country with a socialist society, and took millions of dollars with them.” Common sense broke the agency’s poker face. “He said, ‘Well, I guess when you put it that way.’”

http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/issue-sec ... s-archive/

[Cherry Kelly]

add to it all - the other minority groups demanding free college or those demanding reparations (slavery??) of their grgr grandparents or grgrgr --. And as noted religions are also being persecuted or should say people in the various religious groups ... who are being sued if they refuse services that go against their religious beliefs.
YES the list gets longer all the time. Illegals pouring across the borders (even those with criminal lists longer than several pages) and ICE being denied to lock them up. Schools inundated with -- as one recent article stated 120 diff languages foreign students. Simply not enough teachers to handle it all.
Then we find out about all the people having to work 2 or 3 jobs to make ends meet. AND then this administration claiming low unemployment and counting each job (not how many people working 2-3 jobs, but as 2-3 people working). etc.
GOOD Subject and so true.

[Riddick]

While we're at it with normalizing deviancy what about Necrophiliacs?

[voguy]

You have to wonder if we shouldn't be renaming North America to Sodom and Gomorrah.

I forgot too the story last year about the people petitioning the courts to marry their dogs and one wanted to marry a horse.

I'm re-evaluating my moving plans for an area with high ground. If you see someone building an Ark, please tip me off.

[kbot]

Aaaahhhhhhh..... you're all a bunch of haters!!!!!!!

As a country, we're screwed. We have the inmates running the place and the overwhelming majority either to cowed, or indifferent or threatened to either care or say something without getting gang-tackled by the ACLU and the "injured parties".

I wonder......... do ACLU offices have gender-neutral restrooms???????

[Raggedyann]

WARNING: Graphic Discussion

Last year there was all the hoopla over getting rid of Confederate symbols including flags, patches, statues, and let's not forget The General Lee. That's right, a friggin car in a TV show is now so offensive some people have charged they were made sick by looking at it.

Then we had the gay rights demands where .1% were able to demand change although 99.9% opposed it. Today we have the sill ass bathroom wars, with President Obama's mandate to schools that they all conform, (a massive overreach).

I said this would happen, and Germany, (of all nations), is considering allowing sex with minors as seen in this story below from November 1, 2015. So now some in North America are considering pushing this subject by rewording the law to leave in "consensual" but remove the age limit. Meaning that as long as a minor says it's OK, it's legal. The groups pushing this are from three nations, Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

As I said before, when you want things, and push for things, sometimes the consequences of actions bring you unintended things which you never dreamed would transpire. Unfortunately, there is case law in play here and by granting and executing the situations people have demanded in the past few years they have now opened the door to this.

Note: Snopes says it's not going to happen, but the darknet is buzzing with traffic on how this can come to be. And in one case, a poster named "LesterBB" said that some in their fold are claiming it not to be true simply to fool the public into thinking this is not happening, thus sliding it in under the radar.

I'm posting just the link to the German story as the content is rather "graphic". The site in the U.S. is even worse with pictures.
LINK TO STORY

Additional Links:

Germany's Green Party leader regrets campaign to 'legalise paedophilia'
A Major German Political Party Used to Support Pedophilia
Snopes Take on the Subject

I'll go with the Snopes assessment of this Enquirer mentality garbage.

Comparing equal rights laws regarding the LGBT community to paedophilia is very disturbing.

In essence, what you are saying is that society should never culturally progress because silly pious people think this will open door to all sorts of vile behaviour becoming legal. Some believe that various minorities in society should be just ignored and over ruled for no reason than these folks' desire to live a free and equal existence, just doesn't sit well with them, but it seems that it's the knuckle dragger's that the majority of our rational members of society have decided to over rule and ignore.

[kbot]

WARNING: Graphic Discussion

Last year there was all the hoopla over getting rid of Confederate symbols including flags, patches, statues, and let's not forget The General Lee. That's right, a friggin car in a TV show is now so offensive some people have charged they were made sick by looking at it.

Then we had the gay rights demands where .1% were able to demand change although 99.9% opposed it. Today we have the sill ass bathroom wars, with President Obama's mandate to schools that they all conform, (a massive overreach).

I said this would happen, and Germany, (of all nations), is considering allowing sex with minors as seen in this story below from November 1, 2015. So now some in North America are considering pushing this subject by rewording the law to leave in "consensual" but remove the age limit. Meaning that as long as a minor says it's OK, it's legal. The groups pushing this are from three nations, Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

As I said before, when you want things, and push for things, sometimes the consequences of actions bring you unintended things which you never dreamed would transpire. Unfortunately, there is case law in play here and by granting and executing the situations people have demanded in the past few years they have now opened the door to this.

Note: Snopes says it's not going to happen, but the darknet is buzzing with traffic on how this can come to be. And in one case, a poster named "LesterBB" said that some in their fold are claiming it not to be true simply to fool the public into thinking this is not happening, thus sliding it in under the radar.

I'm posting just the link to the German story as the content is rather "graphic". The site in the U.S. is even worse with pictures.
LINK TO STORY

Additional Links:

Germany's Green Party leader regrets campaign to 'legalise paedophilia'
A Major German Political Party Used to Support Pedophilia
Snopes Take on the Subject

I'll go with the Snopes assessment of this Enquirer mentality garbage.

Comparing equal rights laws regarding the LGBT community to paedophilia is very disturbing.

In essence, what you are saying is that society should never culturally progress because silly pious people think this will open door to all sorts of vile behaviour becoming legal. Some believe that various minorities in society should be just ignored and over ruled for no reason than these folks' desire to live a free and equal existence, just doesn't sit well with them, but it seems that it's the knuckle dragger's that the majority of our rational members of society have decided to over rule and ignore.

RA, I'm not completely convinced that the fears are unjustified as evidenced by the recent case in Seattle........

Snippet:

Man caught undressing in front of girls at Green Lake locker room
Editorial note: I am choosing to refer to the individual as a male, as the Parks Department has related the story to me indicating as such.

Seattle Parks and Recreation has confirmed an adult male inappropriately used a female locker room at Evans Pool in Green Lake while a youth swim team used the facilities on Feb. 8

Was the individual a male inappropriately using the facilities or a transgender female well within her rights?

Related: One reason why Washington’s transgender bill failed in Olympia

“This didn’t seem like a transgender issue to staff &#8212 someone who was ‘identifying’ as a woman,” Seattle Parks and Recreation Communications Manager David Takami told me via email. “We have guidelines that allow transgender individuals to use restrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity.”

At around 5:30 p.m. on Feb. 8, an adult went into the locker room to change. Takami says that at “no time did he verbally ‘identify’ as female,” nor did he request to be treated as transgender.

At the time, a local youth swim team was using the facilities. Young girls and some of their parents “became alarmed” that the male was changing in the female locker room and alerted the front desk staff. Staff members then “asked the man to leave and offered the availability of a family changing room.”

He did not accept the offer.

After his swim, he “again entered the women’s locker room to change.” Front desk staff once again asked him to leave “and he eventually did.”

Perhaps complicating matters, a witness who contacted KIRO Radio indicated this male was wearing men’s clothing as he entered the locker room.

Takami maintains that the parks department wants everyone to feel comfortable. But if this individual was, in fact, transgender, was this situation handled correctly? And is it appropriate to call the individual a male?

If this isn’t a “transgender issue” why didn’t staffers call the police? Critics of the failed transgender bathroom bill indicate there are already rules to punish people who break the law.

According to the law: “If another person expresses concern or discomfort about a person who uses a facility that is consistent with the person’s gender expression or gender identity, the person expressing discomfort should be directed to a separate or gender-neutral facility, if available.”

Related: New transgender rule gives gym owner ‘no protection from the law’

But Takami says everyone involved (the patrons complaining and the male individual) were offered a separate accommodation.

The law further states: “Any action taken against a person who is using a restroom or other gender-segregated facility, such as removing a person, should be taken due to that person’s actions or behavior while in the facility, and must be unrelated to gender expression or gender identity.”

There is no indication that this individual did anything inappropriate, if the person identifies as transgender. But Seattle Parks and Recreation did not believe he was transgender. So why didn’t they call the police?

“That was an option, but staff try to deal with issues immediately, and try not to call police as the first option,” Takami said.

This incident raises questions that go to the heart of the issue and controversy over gender-neutral bathroom protections. We’re told that the concern that a male using a female locker room is overblown and rarely happens. If you were to look into this incident, because police weren’t called, there’s no paper trail that the average person could discover indicating this issue happened. The only reason we’re aware of the incident is due to a KIRO Radio listener who spoke up. So it’s problematic for activists to claim these incidents don’t happen if police aren’t always being called.
http://mynorthwest.com/188993/man-caugh ... cker-room/

There will always be those who test the waters and file suits "just because.....". On the other hand, would you want your daughter exposed to situations such as this? I wouldn't (assuming that I had a daughter...)

[voguy]

As usual, R.A. convolutes the message.

The big issue is of course what I would hope most of us see as the opportunity for crimes against the most innocent in society.

The invisible issue is case law, and how people are able to use it for their own deviant means. The ways laws are written are often like a screen in the window. Properly installed they keep out the blood sucking mosquitoes. With the screen breached you now have a few mosquitoes get through. Same applies to what we choose in society for laws. Once a law is created it can become the grounds for argument for other laws, or striking down portions of other laws. Since Germany has relaxed many laws of sexual nature it's easy to argue that the age barrier can now be struck, so the only deciding factor it permission. And at least one group in North America plans a similar run at it based again on case law.

So while it doesn't play into your knuckle dragger's that the majority mantra, recent changes do play easily into arguing that with overturning one aspect of sex, you can now overturn two. The only two things the N.A. proponents don't have in their favor is public opinion and money to lobby. However, under the radar of people, and behind the backs of legislators they stand a damn good chance of passing it.

[Riddick]

C'mon, what's all this hoopla over rights anyway? It's a nice thought, having them, and yet for all the good they can do you can't depend on them: Bottom line, as Geroge Carlin put it temporary privileges is all they really are. There's no protection when what government gives, government can take away knowhutImean

So we're all entitled to our opinions? By what right? George has an answer for that:

[Doka]

Riddick:



So we're all entitled to our opinions? By what right? George has an answer for that:

I thought that is already being done?