I mean exactly what "I" said and NOT what YOU said below:That defies common sense, are you sure that's what you intended to say, Divinorumus?
What YOU said above is NOT what "I" said. You cheated when you put a microphone and camera in there, essentially having open the box and observed the cat, thus causing the superposition to collapse into a determined state.I'm confident we would all acknowledge that if a camera, and perhaps a microphone, were fully functional and with those people trapped in the mine at any moment then we would say that such a camera and microphone with live remote capabilities were fully functional and demostrated the presence of their bodies, perhaps even if they were alive or not, most everyone would rely upon the information transferred as true and in real or nearly real/immediate actual time.
What I'm saying is remote viewing (which is actually an incorrect way to state this) won't work unless you know which timeline you are following, and that won't be determined if/until that superposition has collapsed. That Schrödinger's cat thing! Until the box is opened and the contents viewed, the cat is neither known to be alive or dead, and thus no trick called remote viewing will allow you to see what hasn't been determined yet unless in the future the box is actually opened.
Go read about superpositions and that Schrödinger's cat experiment and you'll see nobody can know until the box, or cave, is opened, if at all, and the contents observed.
I do not think you understand what I'm talking about. Go read about Schrödinger's cat and you'll see what I mean. Both situations ARE possible until one superposition or the other has been forced to collapse.Well, Divinorumus, a mind can do the same thing as the camera, and more subtly, of course, even fathoming whether they are asleep or alive far better than a camera, which still necessitates a remote viewer sensitive to the images and sounds, which itself is a form of psychometry, Divinorumus.
