NASA's biggest lie to be exposed.

Moderator: Super Moderators

User avatar
johnlear
Pirate
Posts: 2164
Joined: 11-30-2003 07:41 PM

Post by johnlear » 08-15-2005 10:51 PM

Bean was not standing in Picard or even near Picard but for those of you interested in this thread please check out the following:

http://www.vgl.org/webfiles/lan/picard.htm
The lie is different at every level. (RCH)
Including his. (JOL)

User avatar
Laird
Pirate
Posts: 4490
Joined: 11-26-2002 03:00 AM
Contact:

Post by Laird » 08-16-2005 12:31 AM

Nutz I didn't finish reading pages 12 and 13 but I have the giest
of this thread.

Hey John, would it be faster if I sent you my orginial black and white slides from Apollo 11? I have some rather interesting ones
dated August 69 ... that all have d3 on the right after the sequential number

there awsome slides with stuff that I've never seen published by NASA>
"Speak softly and carry a big stick" Teddy Roosevelt

User avatar
tiffany
Pirate
Posts: 18974
Joined: 06-28-2003 02:25 PM

Post by tiffany » 08-16-2005 12:47 AM

Quite interesting John. I'm following.

User avatar
Oswald
Pirate
Posts: 464
Joined: 08-10-2005 03:05 AM
Contact:

Post by Oswald » 08-16-2005 12:52 AM

I'm still surfing though all the material that has been presented, but I am following along at home.
You tell those bastards that if they know what is good for them, they had better surrender because I will never be far away. -George S. Patton Jr.

snowbird
Pirate
Posts: 507
Joined: 02-02-2001 03:00 AM

Post by snowbird » 08-16-2005 08:13 AM

johnlear wrote: Attachment: alanbeand.jpg


The sun is reflected through that grid again, til it fades into the darkness. The grid is interesting and does not give me the feeling of glass at all, but a screen of some sort. Not unlike, perhaps, a safety glass with the screen sandwiched in the centre of the glass, only the grid of steel, or whatever is thicker and closer together. That grid is a mystery to me. It doesn't compute - why is it there?

snowbird.

User avatar
Dale O Sea
Rogue Wingnut Pirate
Posts: 17339
Joined: 04-19-2003 10:10 PM
Contact:

Post by Dale O Sea » 08-16-2005 09:34 AM

Snowbird, I believe that the grid is just some crosshatch shading done by the artist in his "That's How it Felt to Walk on the Moon" painting to give the impression of the sun reflecting from his convex, dark-mirrored visor.. I do notice a little irregularity in his shading pattern though.
Here is a blow-up of that feature:

Image

But I think what John is wanting us to see, as mudwoman eluded to earlier, is the color of the sun in all those paintings is represented as being yellowish. There would be no yellow sun in a vacuum. The yellow sun we see every day, the one reflecting off of John's visor, is due to its light being refracted (separated/filtered) as it passes thru the atmosphere. Then having a scattering effect happen to it called Rayleigh Scattering which causes the sunlight to appear yellow as its blue component gets filtered out of its white whole spectrum color.

If you have Powerpoint on your PC here is a very good presentation of how the atmosphere effects sunlight. It's where I borrowed the illustration below. The Powerpoint link above is for a 2MB download of a free PP viewer from Microsoft. It worked great for me.

http://www.ph.unimelb.edu.au/html/event ... he_sky.ppt

User avatar
johnlear
Pirate
Posts: 2164
Joined: 11-30-2003 07:41 PM

Post by johnlear » 08-16-2005 09:55 AM

Dale OSea wrote: Snowbird, I believe that the grid is just some crosshatch shading done by the artist to give the impression of the sun reflecting from his convex, dark-mirrored visor.. I do notice a little irregularity in his shading pattern though. I'll attach a blow-up of that feature.

But I think what John is wanting us to see, as mudwoman eluded to earlier, is the color of the sun in all those paintings is represented as being yellowish. There would be no yellow sun in a vacuum. The yellow sun we see every day, the one reflecting off of John's visor, is due to its light being refracted (separated/filtered) as it passes thru the atmosphere. Then having a scattering effect happen to it called Rayleigh Scattering which causes the sunlight to appear yellow as its blue component gets filtered out of its white whole spectrum color.

If you have powerpoint on your PC here is a very good presentation of how the atmosphere affects sunlight:

http://www.ph.unimelb.edu.au/html/event ... he_sky.ppt



Thanks Dale for this explanation. The power point presentation is excellent.
The lie is different at every level. (RCH)
Including his. (JOL)

snowbird
Pirate
Posts: 507
Joined: 02-02-2001 03:00 AM

Post by snowbird » 08-16-2005 10:16 AM

Thanks Dale, that was a fabulous explanation.

snowbird

User avatar
johnlear
Pirate
Posts: 2164
Joined: 11-30-2003 07:41 PM

Post by johnlear » 08-16-2005 10:19 AM

Dale OSea wrote: Snowbird, I believe that the grid is just some crosshatch shading done by the artist in his "That's How it Felt to Walk on the Moon" painting to give the impression of the sun reflecting from his convex, dark-mirrored visor.. I do notice a little irregularity in his shading pattern though.
Here is a blow-up of that feature:

Image

That could be one explanation. But also note that the sun has just risen. If there was anything of a latticed nature above Bean then the sun would briefly reflect the underside. The cross hatching does not appear in any other of the 79 or so paintings in "Apollo: An Eyewitness Account".
The lie is different at every level. (RCH)
Including his. (JOL)

User avatar
Dale O Sea
Rogue Wingnut Pirate
Posts: 17339
Joined: 04-19-2003 10:10 PM
Contact:

Post by Dale O Sea » 08-16-2005 12:56 PM

johnlear wrote: That could be one explanation. But also note that the sun has just risen. If there was anything of a latticed nature above Bean then the sun would briefly reflect the underside. The cross hatching does not appear in any other of the 79 or so paintings in "Apollo: An Eyewitness Account".


"...anything of a latticed nature.." Like girders?
______________

I put up an accompanying album for the images used in this thread. It can be found in the PiratePix Gallery here:
http://www.fantasticforum.com/d29d/gallery/album194

User avatar
johnlear
Pirate
Posts: 2164
Joined: 11-30-2003 07:41 PM

Post by johnlear » 08-16-2005 01:04 PM

For those of you following this thread and concerning the lattice-like or cross-hatching in the faceplate of Bean's self portrait I would like to bring your attention to some photos obtained through the courtesy of Enterprisemission.com. The following material is from enterprisemission.com and can be found at:

http://www.enterprisemission.com/mphotos.html

Apollo 12 Lunar Module in front of lunar ruins.

Three versions of 16mm frames, “grabbed” from official NASA 1969 post-mission Apollo 12 film:”Pinpoint for Science” courtesy of EnterpriseMission.com.

For some reason I can't get Frames 1,2 and 3 to come up in this post. They can be seen in the gallery.

Frame #1 (B&W—left) is from original 16mm film, created on an animation stand in a NASA studio on Earth; a color paper print—made from an original 70mm color transparency photographed by an Apollo 12 astronaut on the lunar surface—was rephotographed on 16mm color film. Frame #2 and #3 (below) are computer-enhancements of two more frames, as recorded on the 27-year-old NASA distributed film.

Note “inclined, multi-leveled buttresses” behind the LM “Intrepid”. These and other Apollo 12 lunar surface photographs, now leave little doubt as to Apollo 12’s real objectives at this Oceanus Procellarum landing site—to investigate a set of ancient ruins on the moon.

For enlargements of these photos please go to enterprisemission.com or see Dale's photo album in the gallery.
Last edited by johnlear on 08-16-2005 01:20 PM, edited 1 time in total.
The lie is different at every level. (RCH)
Including his. (JOL)

User avatar
johnlear
Pirate
Posts: 2164
Joined: 11-30-2003 07:41 PM

Post by johnlear » 08-16-2005 01:22 PM

johnlear wrote: For those of you following this thread and concerning the lattice-like or cross-hatching in the faceplate of Bean's self portrait I would like to bring your attention to some photos obtained through the courtesy of Enterprisemission.com. The following material is from enterprisemission.com and can be found at:

http://www.enterprisemission.com/mphotos.html

Apollo 12 Lunar Module in front of lunar ruins.

Three versions of 16mm frames, “grabbed” from official NASA 1969 post-mission Apollo 12 film:”Pinpoint for Science” courtesy of EnterpriseMission.com.

For some reason I can't get Frames 1,2 and 3 to come up in this post. They can be seen in the gallery.

Frame #1 (B&W—left) is from original 16mm film, created on an animation stand in a NASA studio on Earth; a color paper print—made from an original 70mm color transparency photographed by an Apollo 12 astronaut on the lunar surface—was rephotographed on 16mm color film. Frame #2 and #3 (below) are computer-enhancements of two more frames, as recorded on the 27-year-old NASA distributed film.

Note “inclined, multi-leveled buttresses” behind the LM “Intrepid”. These and other Apollo 12 lunar surface photographs, now leave little doubt as to Apollo 12’s real objectives at this Oceanus Procellarum landing site—to investigate a set of ancient ruins on the moon.

For enlargements of these photos please go to enterprisemission.com or see Dale's photo album in the gallery.


For some reason I can't get frames 1, 2 and 3 to come up in this post. They can be seen in the gallery.
The lie is different at every level. (RCH)
Including his. (JOL)

User avatar
Dale O Sea
Rogue Wingnut Pirate
Posts: 17339
Joined: 04-19-2003 10:10 PM
Contact:

Post by Dale O Sea » 08-16-2005 01:42 PM

John asked me to post these frames from one of Hoagland's images:

Image

Image

Image

Don't blame me for the quality. It looks like they've been xeroxed or scanned a few dozen times to me, heh. I could make them bigger but it wouldn't help much..

User avatar
johnlear
Pirate
Posts: 2164
Joined: 11-30-2003 07:41 PM

Post by johnlear » 08-16-2005 02:00 PM

More from enterprisemission.com is the following:

Remarkable Similarity of Ruins at Apollo 12 and 14 Landing Sites

Image
Apollo 12 Lunar Module (above) imaged on a single black and white frame “grabbed” from widely distributed NASA film “Pinpoint For Science” 1969. On this computer-enhanced image the LM was photographed by astronauts against a striking, layered, highly geometric inclined “buttress” made of glass!
Image
On the color computer-enhancement (above) of a hand held 70mm Hasselblad image from Apollo 14 this same type of “highly geometric inclined grid” is also visible complete with layering. The differences in sizes of similar geometric features in the two images (see enlargement below), is an indication of the distance to each buttress from each respective LM-at the two respective landing sites located only 122 miles apart.
Image

Edit - John, I just edited the pix into your post. -Dale
The lie is different at every level. (RCH)
Including his. (JOL)

snowbird
Pirate
Posts: 507
Joined: 02-02-2001 03:00 AM

Post by snowbird » 08-16-2005 02:07 PM

Is there any possibility at all that the "ruins" we're looking at could be some crashed Russian equipment? I don't remember if the Russians ever succeeded in sending anything to the moon.

I remember seeing a documentary which featured the Clementine movies of the surface of the "dark" side of the moon. As the camera skimmed the surface, you could see quite a few tall spires, casting long shadows. The commentator made *not one* comment about these. In fact, I don't remember ever hearing any official comment about these spires. They must truly think we're stupid.

As deafening as the silence is from TPTB, it's quite obvious the everything is not as it seems. It seems that the easiest thing for them to do is to cross their fingers, say nothing and hope that things die down.... maybe we'll go away.

s.
Last edited by snowbird on 08-16-2005 02:10 PM, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply

Return to “Conspiracies/Black Ops”