Re: Paris' 2 CC's surrounded by the UN's olive leaves!
Posted: 12-09-2017 09:42 AM
Wow Riddick, what a "real world" series of pic posters about our love and hate relationship with carbon. It's ashes to ashes and dust to dust, that's all of us, the dreaded Carbon People!
This "t***t" was seen on Twitter today and it's a bit dated to make the members point on raising cattle, properly.
Here's more on the farmer's livestock out gassing upon Mum Earth but she expels her methane in a tonnage per hour that's not even calculable!
Climate Chicanery
October 30, 2009
Posted by Angelique in Global warming.
Tags: animal ag, carbon footprint, climate change, cows, Food ethics, Global warming
trackback
More fodder for global warming skeptics comes from a report by two World Bank affiliates in the November-December issue of World Watch. The article, “Livestock and Climate Change,” does not deny the reality of global warming or the role of livestock in accelerating it, as presented in the 2006 UN Food and Agriculture Organization’s report Livestock’s Long Shadow. Rather, authors Goodland and Anhang assert that the UN FAO report, which is the definitive study of this topic, understates the volume of livestock greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by a whopping 400%. Which makes the climate change researchers at the FAO – and people like me who have relied on their analysis – look like idiots.
But if the FAO report really is massively wrong, out the truth must come, regardless of the resulting damage to the credibility of climate research. So, are Goodland and Anhang courageously exposing a botched analysis, or disingenuously furthering the anti-meat cause with a botched analysis of their own?
https://fromanimaltomeat.com/2009/10/30 ... ery/?YreGu
Just because cows do pass gas it's a wonder in modern/PC/cc times we don't pay a similar price per pound for beef in America, the same as they have for the last 50 years in Japan.
But maybe someday we will because by then the deep state will be out touting a changing climate and demand it!
MK II
This "t***t" was seen on Twitter today and it's a bit dated to make the members point on raising cattle, properly.
Here's more on the farmer's livestock out gassing upon Mum Earth but she expels her methane in a tonnage per hour that's not even calculable!
Climate Chicanery
October 30, 2009
Posted by Angelique in Global warming.
Tags: animal ag, carbon footprint, climate change, cows, Food ethics, Global warming
trackback
More fodder for global warming skeptics comes from a report by two World Bank affiliates in the November-December issue of World Watch. The article, “Livestock and Climate Change,” does not deny the reality of global warming or the role of livestock in accelerating it, as presented in the 2006 UN Food and Agriculture Organization’s report Livestock’s Long Shadow. Rather, authors Goodland and Anhang assert that the UN FAO report, which is the definitive study of this topic, understates the volume of livestock greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by a whopping 400%. Which makes the climate change researchers at the FAO – and people like me who have relied on their analysis – look like idiots.
But if the FAO report really is massively wrong, out the truth must come, regardless of the resulting damage to the credibility of climate research. So, are Goodland and Anhang courageously exposing a botched analysis, or disingenuously furthering the anti-meat cause with a botched analysis of their own?
https://fromanimaltomeat.com/2009/10/30 ... ery/?YreGu
Just because cows do pass gas it's a wonder in modern/PC/cc times we don't pay a similar price per pound for beef in America, the same as they have for the last 50 years in Japan.
But maybe someday we will because by then the deep state will be out touting a changing climate and demand it!
MK II