A Trans-Atlantic Revolt Against Central Bankers

Discussion of the economy

Moderator: Super Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Riddick
Pirate
Posts: 15703
Joined: 11-01-2002 03:00 AM
Location: Heartland USA
Contact:

A Trans-Atlantic Revolt Against Central Bankers

Post by Riddick » 10-12-2016 01:28 PM

The International Monetary Fund last week sharply lowered its growth forecasts for the United States and other advanced economies. Only three months ago, in July, the IMF was predicting U.S. growth of 2.2% this year. But in the October edition of its World Economic Outlook report, that figure has been cut to 1.6%. The report’s authors blame “political discontent” and policy uncertainty for the deteriorating prognosis—in other words, they’re worried about Donald Trump.

Meanwhile, the IMF is forecasting dismal 1.1% growth for the United Kingdom in 2017, which is half the 2.2% it predicted in April before Britons voted in June to leave the European Union. The downgrade reflects the fund’s opinion that uncertainty over Brexit will depress consumer spending as well as business investment and hiring.

No one would disagree that disappointing economic results since the 2008 financial meltdown have spawned political agitation. People want change. But it’s interesting—quite telling, really—that the IMF assumes democratically determined outcomes will make things worse.

The IMF plays an instrumental role in global finance, and its innate disdain for the wisdom of voters helps fan widespread political dissatisfaction. It suggests that elites, as they pursue broad economic objectives, disregard the hardship that their policy decisions impose on many average workers. The fact that some people—global financial market participants—are enriched by those same policies fuels social and political tensions.

Mr. Trump has expressed strong views about the Fed’s dubious contribution to economic well-being. He appears to have struck a chord with voters by challenging both the model and the motives of an independent government agency that insists on exercising total discretion.

Mr. Trump readily admits that, as a developer, he likes low interest rates; at the same time, he recognizes that others have been penalized by the Fed’s monetary-policy decisions. As he said in a Sept. 12 CNBC interview: “The people that were hurt the worst are people that saved their money all their lives and thought they would live off their interest, and those people are getting just absolutely creamed.”

Mr. Trump also believes that “we are in a bubble right now” and that it may well come crashing down with the next uptick in interest rates, which he says is being delayed for political reasons. Questioning the judgment of Fed officials is considered out of bounds—one is not supposed to “politicize” our nation’s central bank.

But in a similarly audacious move, British Prime Minister Theresa May took on her own nation’s central bank in an Oct. 5 speech at her Conservative Party’s annual conference. “People with assets have got richer,” she said. “People without them have suffered. People with mortgages have found their debts cheaper. People with savings have found themselves poorer.”

Both Mr. Trump and Mrs. May say that the economy should work for everyone—not merely the privileged few. A nation’s government should act in the interests of everyday, working-class people. If fundamental reforms are needed to ensure that central-bank policies do not stratify citizens into winners and losers, so be it. Money should function as a reliable measuring tool and dependable store of value—not as an instrument of government policy.

Maybe a new Republican administration in the White House will actually shake up the status quo by launching a successful pro-growth economic agenda. Maybe Brexit will prove liberating and serve to enhance the U.K.’s growth potential.

It’s not as if the IMF has any new prescriptions. In a Sept. 28 speech at Northwestern University, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde dismissed as “pessimists” those who think central banks are not stimulating economic growth. “In my view, there is more policy space—more room to act—than is commonly believed,” she declared. “Monetary policy in advanced economies needs to remain expansive at this stage.”

Pesky voters, it seems, have had quite enough.

FULL STORY
A mind should not be so open that the brains fall out; however, it should not be so closed that whatever gray matter which does reside may not be reached. ART BELL

Everything Woke turns to Image
-Donald Trump Image

User avatar
Doka
Pirate
Posts: 7967
Joined: 09-02-2009 08:15 PM

Re: A Trans-Atlantic Revolt Against Central Bankers

Post by Doka » 10-12-2016 07:13 PM

This is really how we are screwed and all the other 4 letter words, economically , we are going to suffer a world wide "Adjustment" it just cannot happen! If Hillary wins it's a double banger, we also have no hope of ever experiencing prosperity of the people ever again.
KARMA RULES

Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities': Voltaire

Post Reply

Return to “Economy”