Peter Strzok, what Will Mueller Do Without Him?

Grassroots democracy. We need to secure our country from the global elites. Act now! Get informed.

Moderator: Super Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Doka
Pirate
Posts: 3856
Joined: 09-02-2009 08:15 PM

Peter Strzok, what Will Mueller Do Without Him?

Post by Doka » 12-05-2017 01:11 AM

What an Incredible ,devious, expensive(tax payers Are paying for this), way to set-up to impeach a President. :shock:




Good Grief – Fired FBI Investigator Was The Person Who Interviewed Flynn…
Posted on December 4, 2017 by sundance


OK, before going further, we need to step back and take a look at how deeply enmeshed Deputy Head of Counterintelligence FBI Agent Peter Strzok was to this entire FBI investigative enterprise.

•Peter Strzok was the lead FBI agent in charge of the Hillary Clinton email investigation. •Agent Peter Strzok was one of a small group who interviewed Hillary Clinton. •Agent Strzok was also the FBI contact person to receive the Russian Dossier and interview the author Christopher Steele. [Remember, Hillary Clinton’s team paid Christopher Steele (via Fusion GPS) to create the dossier.] •Agent Strzok was the primary counterintelligence investigator for the ‘vast Russian conspiracy’, narrative. •Agent Strzok was then hired by Robert Mueller to lead the FBI investigative efforts into the “Russian Election Collusion/Conspiracy.” • Agent Strzok was removed from the Mueller Team after the anti-Trump/pro-Clinton content of his internal communications were discovered by the current Inspector General investigation….


and today we discover that Deputy Head of Counterintelligence, FBI Agent Peter Strzok was the person who interviewed National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn on January 24th, 2017. An interview, that blindsided Flynn because there was no advanced notification…. And an interview that was the basis for the recent Robert Mueller charging of Flynn.

Good grief, it’s no wonder why the FBI desperately tried to control a pending IG release by advance-scripting a narrative, via leaks to the New York Times and Washington Post.

If FBI Agent Strzok can be shown to have conflicting political and institutional bias, then every aspect of the investigation he was involved in comes into question… and Agent Strzok is at the EPICENTER of every angle, within every aspect, of EVERY investigation.

SARA CARTER – A supervisory special agent who is now under scrutiny after being removed from Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel’s Office for alleged bias against President Trump also oversaw the bureau’s interviews of embattled former National Security advisor Michael Flynn, this reporter has learned.




FBI agent Peter Strzok was one of two FBI agents who interviewed Flynn, which took place on Jan. 24, at the White House, said several sources. The other FBI special agent, who interviewed Flynn, is described by sources as a field supervisor in the “Russian Squad, at the FBI’s Washington Field Office,” according to a former intelligence official, with knowledge of the interview.

The former U.S. intelligence official told this reporter, “with the recent revelation that Strzok was removed from the Special Counsel investigation for making anti-Trump text messages it seems likely that the accuracy and veracity of the 302 of Flynn’s interview as a whole should be reviewed and called into question.”


“The most logical thing to happen would be to call the other FBI Special Agent present during Flynn’s interview before the Grand Jury to recount his version,” the former intelligence official added.


The Rest of this compelling Story

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... wed-flynn/
Karma Rules

User avatar
Doka
Pirate
Posts: 3856
Joined: 09-02-2009 08:15 PM

Re: Peter Strzok, what Will Mueller Do Without Him?

Post by Doka » 12-06-2017 01:05 PM

The importance of this particular story is not the story itself , but where it came from and allowed to be printed......None other than the New York Post ! As Pure a Democrat paper as they have got!



Latest revelations make the entire ‘collusion’ probe look like a partisan hit

So Peter Strzok wasn’t just a top investigator for special counsel Robert Mueller until he was axed for anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias: He was also a major player in the Hillary email probe and the FBI work that led to the “collusion” investigation.

SEE ALSO

FBI agent kicked off Mueller probe changed language in Comey's Clinton memo

And Mueller and the FBI both dragged their feet on sharing key info about all this with Congress

The Rest of the Story
https://nypost.com/2017/12/05/latest-re ... tisan-hit/
Karma Rules

User avatar
Doka
Pirate
Posts: 3856
Joined: 09-02-2009 08:15 PM

Re: Peter Strzok, what Will Mueller Do Without Him?

Post by Doka » 12-06-2017 01:47 PM

Non-Partisan ??? Or "Witch Hunt" ?




Another One! Mueller Deputy Was Personal Attorney of Ben Rhodes, Represented Clinton Foundation

On Fox News Tuesday night, Laura Ingraham reported that yet another one of Robert Mueller's deputies in his Russia investigation is compromised due to her track record as a blatant partisan.

Jeannie Rhee, who was hired by Mueller last summer to work on the probe, was the personal attorney of Ben Rhodes and also represented the Clinton Foundation, Ingraham revealed. "This information will put further pressure on Special Prosecutor Bob Mueller to resign."

Rhee is the third member of the Mueller team this week who has been shown to be brazenly partisan. Two other members of the team have been revealed as highly questionable hires in recent days as well — Peter Strzok, an anti-Trumper who helped exonerate Hillary Clinton, and Andrew Weissmann, an unscrupulous prosecutor who told outgoing acting Attorney General Sally Yates in an email that he was "proud" of her for defying President Trump's travel ban.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/another-on ... oundation/
Karma Rules

User avatar
Doka
Pirate
Posts: 3856
Joined: 09-02-2009 08:15 PM

Re: Peter Strzok, what Will Mueller Do Without Him?

Post by Doka » 12-08-2017 03:34 PM

I just don't see Trump being so "Passive" on Mueller, could it be that he is just watching Mueller tighten his own noose or is he going to just let it all slide.?




An attorney for special counsel Robert Mueller attended Hillary Clinton’s election night party in New York City, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday.


Andrew Weissmann’s attendance at the party is one of many signs pointing to a troubling bias from the attorney. Weissmann has been described by The New York Times as Mueller’s “lieutenant” and “pit bull.”

Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch obtained an email Tuesday that reveled Weissmann praised former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates’ defiance of Trump.

“I am so proud. And in awe. Thank you so much. All my deepest respects,” Weissmann wrote to Yates on Jan. 30. The email followed Yates’ instruction to the DOJ not to defend an executive order banning immigration from seven nations, an act that led to her dismissal by President Trump.

Weissmann is one of several Democratic donors that have been hired by Mueller, a registered Republican. The special counsel’s “pit bull” donated a combined $6,600 to the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

The special counsel’s probe has been criticized by Trump’s allies, but the White House maintains Trump has no intention to fire Mueller.

The Rest of the Story

http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/08/muell ... ght-party/
Karma Rules

Post Reply

Return to “American Survival”