Tonight I saw
Brokeback Mountain for the first time in three and a half years. It is only three and a half years, but it seems like a full decade ago.
I was somewhat apprehensive about reviewing the movie, since I wondered whether I would think less of it after such a length of time.
I shouldn't have worried.
Brokeback Mountain is just as great a film in 2009 as it was in December of 2005. Ang Lee richly deserved his Oscar for directing it, and Larry McMurtry richly deserved his Oscar for the screenplay, a work of art that bears comparison with
The Last Picture Show,
Terms of Endearment and
Lonesome Dove. And oh, that Oscar-winning score, so sparse and yet so rich with emotion...
Brokeback Mountain was clearly the most significant film of 2005, and its stature was enhanced, not diminished, by its failure to win the top Oscar for that year. And the posthumous awarding of the
Best Supporting Actor Oscar for 2008 is the Academy's shamefaced recognition that it did wrong in not giving Heath Ledger the
Best Actor Oscar for 2005. And oh, what we as an audience have lost by his senseless death a year and a half ago, for Heath Ledger was a truly great actor...
Brokeback Mountain is NOT a gay film. On the contrary, it is a highly believable film about a group of characters in a relatively unusual, but hardly inconceivable, situation. As a work of cinematographic art, above and beyond its relevance to gay-themed issues, the film is going to stand the test of time.
As John Keats wrote, "a thing of beauty is a joy forever."
Brokeback Mountain is a thing of beauty, and yes, it will be a joy forever for those people who love movies and who love what only movies can do to enrich our lives...
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_YLH6-GEUQuU/R ... shirt.jpeg