Fantastic Forum the Original Art Bell's Midnight in the Desert and Coast to Coast AM Forum

National Archives to Release Hillary Clinton’s White House Daily Schedules to Judicial Watch before March 20

Archives Seeks to Delay Processing Telephone Logs “One to Two Years”

(Washington, DC) – Judical Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that the National Archives and Records Administration notified the U.S. District Court on March 1 that it expects to release to Judicial Watch 10,000 pages of former First Lady Hillary Clinton’s daily schedule records by March 20, 2008, the date of a status hearing in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit in the matter [Judicial Watch, Inc. v U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Civil Action No: 1:07-cv-01267 (JR)]. The Archives, however, suggests it will take “one to two years” to begin processing Hillary Clinton’s telephone logs.

“The Clinton Presidential Library (“Library”) completed its exacting page-by-page, line-by-line review of approximately 10,000 of the 30,000 pages of records potentially responsive to [Judicial Watch’s] April 5, 2006 Freedom of Information Act request (“Request”) that is the subject of this action,” the National Archives stated in its brief. “The Library has notified the Presidential representatives of the records scheduled for disclosure and anticipates that it will produce those records to plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. in advance of the March 20, 2008 hearing.”

“We are pleased we are finally getting Hillary’s daily schedules despite the Clintons’ delaying tactics,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “And it is ridiculous to expect the American people to wait ‘one to two years’ for the telephone logs of a candidate for the presidency. The Archives needs to get its act together and comply with the law, which requires the timely release of these records.”

Judicial Watch also seeks access to records related to the National Taskforce on Health Care Reform, a “cabinet-level” taskforce chaired by former First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, in a separate lawsuit [Judicial Watch, Inc. v U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Civil Action No: 07-1987 (PLF)] .

For more information on Judicial Watch’s campaign to force the release of Hillary Clinton’s White House records, please click here


Link

They were just talking about this on Meet the Press this morning. They were saying they must be released. Doesn't seem like Clinton nor Obama's supporters who were on with Tim knew about this announcement.

I wonder why they are so reluctant to release these records?

whskyfan wrote: I wonder why they are so reluctant to release these records?

Me too.

Also Bradley was saying on Meet the Press (which will rerun later today) that he is asking why they will not release where the $500,000 came from for Bill's library. He said that would tell alot as to what corporations, foreign entities or whoever were involved in financing. He said we need to have transperacny. Tim also asked her supporter about HC's releasing her duties in the While House and the taxes for these last years. The supporter would not answer the questions and would go off on something else taking the subject off the initial questions.

I would like to see what these records hold and what if anything they are hiding. I suspect there is some things they do not want the public to see.

I read this and think about bush and his use of "executive privilege" . That really bothers me. If Hillary is elected we will never have answers to these questions.

they are only going to get 1/3 of the pages?? - probably a carefully selected 1/3......

Not only where did the $$ come for the library, but what about - where did the money come from for the house in NY??

Yes your right CherryK only 1/3 of the pages.

If a politician has nothing to hide, then why hide things?

Well, no one can say that Hillary isn't a 'professional' politician can they? She certainly seems to be proving that!

Does anyone know if there has ever been a time in the history of Presidential elections, when the 'pickins' have been so totally void?

Yes they have been released and the only thing the press wants to talk about is Lewinsky ! IMO, who cares if Hillary was in the WH when that was going on. There is much more interesting truths there, that need to be brought to light.

tiffany wrote:

whskyfan wrote: I wonder why they are so reluctant to release these records?

Me too.

Also Bradley was saying on Meet the Press (which will rerun later today) that he is asking why they will not release where the $500,000 came from for Bill's library. He said that would tell alot as to what corporations, foreign entities or whoever were involved in financing. He said we need to have transperacny.

Good luck with THAT, eh!? Looking for genuine transparency from the Clintons is like expecting Cos to come clean about his serial sexual abuse -

Not like it's totally beyond comprehension - Hey, just about anything can come to pass provided a person's willing to wait for Hell to freeze over.

Hillary: I’m The Most Transparent Candidate In US History ...Yeah, right.

Curious to know if anyone will be watching the Dem debate tonite?

Diogenes wrote:Curious to know if anyone will be watching the Dem debate tonite?

If someone were to pay me to watch, maybe. But it'd have to be more than minimum wage.