Hillary's Take On The Book "1984"

[Doka]

What makes this so chilling, is that Hillary is the Goddess of the new religion of Hillary. Her New Book, is ,simply put , THE New "Bible".
SOoo, you still think she does not see herself as "God"? She DOES have A large congregation already!


Quote From Book:
"Clinton also slammed women who refused to vote for her, claiming she cannot give them “absolution,”






Hillary: ‘1984’ Teaches Public Should Trust ‘Leaders, The Press, Experts’ Who Know What’s Good for Them

Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton appeared to misinterpret the message behind George Orwell’s 1984 in her new book What Happened.

In her book, Clinton references Orwell’s classic dystopian novel to argue that American citizens should rely on, and not question, their “leaders, the press [and] experts.”


Hillary quote from book:

“Attempting to define reality is a core feature of authoritarianism. This is what the Soviets did when they erased political dissidents from historical photos,” declared Clinton in What Happened. “This is what happens in George Orwell’s classic novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, when a torturer holds up four fingers and delivers electric shocks until his prisoner sees five fingers as ordered.” :

“The goal is to make you question logic and reason and to sow mistrust toward exactly the people we need to rely on: our leaders, the press, experts who seek to guide public policy based on evidence, ourselves,” she continued, seemingly misinterpreting Orwell’s message. “For Trump, as with so much he does, it’s about simple dominance.”

"Users on Twitter quickly criticized the bizarre interpretation, questioning whether Clinton had actually read the book."

Clinton also slammed women who refused to vote for her, claiming she cannot give them “absolution,” and at one point declared, “I thought I’d be a damn good President.”


http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/09/1 ... -for-them/

[Riddick]

Hillary is the Anti-Carlin.

[kbot]

Yes, with Hillary it IS 1984 every day - and imagine if she would have won.............

Hillary Clinton: Abortion is ‘sacrosanct’ and non-negotiable for Democrats

September 13, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — Hillary Clinton calls legalized abortion-on-demand "sacrosanct" and says endorsing it should be a litmus test for Democratic Party legislators.

"After the election," Clinton wrote in her forthcoming book, “What Happened,” "Bernie [Sanders] suggested that Democrats should be open to nominating and supporting candidates who are anti-choice. Other topics, such as economic justice, are sacrosanct, but apparently women's health is not."

"I don't mean to criticize only Bernie here. A lot of progressives join him in thinking that reproductive rights are negotiable," wrote the former Democratic presidential nominee whose surprise loss to Donald Trump left her party searching to ways to recover, including its “pro-choice” rigidity.

According to the Washington Examiner, Clinton in her book resurrects the old claim used by many political liberals -- from former New York Governor Mario Cuomo to Senator Tim Kaine -- that one can be "personally against abortion" and yet support abortion as a “right” in the law.

That duality is universally rejected by the pro-life movement, which regards laws allowing the killing of innocent, defenseless babies in the womb a human rights violation of incalculable proportions. As to Clinton’s tactic of advancing her “pro-choice” views on abortion in the name of “women’s rights,” pro-life women counter that across the world sex-selection abortions disproportionately kill female unborn children.

"I've been working for a quarter century with Democrats and Republicans alike to reduce the number of abortions, in part by expanding access to birth control and family planning, and we've made progress," Clinton wrote, according to the Examiner. "And I picked as my running mate Tim Kaine, a Democrat personally opposed to abortion because of his Catholic faith but supportive of women's rights as a matter of law and policy."

"But," she concludes, "when personal views on abortion become public actions -- votes on legislation or judges or funding that erode women's rights -- that's a different matter."

Understanding that many working-class Democratic voters are pro-life, there is a move afoot to make the Democratic Party -- notoriously rigid in rejecting right-to-life advocacy -- more open to pro-lifers. A March op-ed by Boston College theology professor Thomas Groome in The New York Times is headlined "To Win Again, Democrats Must Stop Being the Abortion Party."

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/hilla ... -democrats

[Riddick]

They like children. So long as they're properly cooked...

[Riddick]

Yes, with Hillary it IS 1984 every day - and imagine if she would have won.............

Trust Your Leaders... OR ELSE

[Riddick]